By TOM MULLEN
Community members and
nutritional experts voiced their opinions and ideas to the Poudre District
Board of Education in an effort to better understand the problem of serving
more nutritional school lunches and propose possible solutions.
Judging from the amount
of discussion and deliberation displayed at the PSD’s Board of Education 6:30 p.m.
meeting, food reform is a hot issue. For the better part of three hours the
topic discussed concerns the current food service programs within schools.
After the call to order and approval of agenda, Board President Thomas Balchak
opened the meeting to community comment.
Darleen Laubenstein,
Kitchen Manager for Fossil Ridge High School, first voiced her thoughts on how a
change in the current school lunch menus will encourage kids to leave campus
for lunch. Community member Monica Morrison also shared her concern for losing
students due to changes and that she was satisfied with the current menu.
PSD Nutrition Substitute,
Patti Dale, argued that the variety of fruits and vegetables offered during
school lunches provides plenty healthy choices for students whose families
might not be able to afford them. She concluded that there is “no problem with
school lunches.”
Later on in the meeting
after discussing some other topics the focus is again brought back to nutritional
services in schools. Virginia Clark, a registered dietitian and member of The
Coalition for Activity and Nutrition to Defeat Obesity (CanDo), gave a
presentation on current food service programs and possible changes that can be
made. Clark cited many statistics taken from a food services parent survey to
argue the changes she said she feels should be made such as creating more
healthy main entrees and improving the overall quality of food. According to
the survey, 65 percent of the current entrees have more than 10 percent
saturated fats, 35 percent have over 800 milligrams of sodium, and 75 percent
have less than five grams of fiber. She concluded that a comprehensive food
service assessment is needed to “provide a clear snapshot of existing
operations” in order to decided which steps to take
.
A second presentation
was given by Craig Schnider, a representative from Child Nutrition Programs, an
organization that assists schools in providing nutritional meals. Schnider
reiterated some of the ideas presented in Clark’s presentation such as the idea
of trying to increase scratch cooking and the continual quality improvement of
the food served in schools. He also supported the idea of a program evaluation
in order to see what is being done right and where to go from here.
Following the presentations
the board members questioned Clark and Schnider on some of their ideas and look
for clarity on some of the solutions proposed such as how their supposed
changes would affect costs and staff. The dietitians answered their questions stating
that though many of their ideas will likely increase costs and staff workloads,
they are for the best. Though the topic is discussed for some time no decisions
were made by the board regarding food reform so far.
No comments:
Post a Comment